Details
-
Type: Bug
-
Status: Open
-
Priority: Medium
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ATNA Questionnnaire, Audit Message Validation
-
Labels:
Description
This is not critical for NA2016, but...
On the EVS Client, you offer a generic audit message validator (IHE - DICOM - General Message Format Conventions [DICOM extension compatible]).
However, in the ATNA Questionnaire, if a vendor implements a transaction that does not have an audit message specification (eg ITI-34, 35, 36) a participant should be able to upload an audit message on the Audit Messages tab and do generic validation.
You can see the issue on the ATNA Questionnaire for Nextrials (http://gazelle.ihe.net/gss/questionnaire/viewer.seam?id=102). They support the RFD transactions, but they do not appear on the Audit tab, and they have no way within the Questionnaire to upload a message for those transactions and perform general DICOM validation.
On the EVS Client, you offer a generic audit message validator (IHE - DICOM - General Message Format Conventions [DICOM extension compatible]).
However, in the ATNA Questionnaire, if a vendor implements a transaction that does not have an audit message specification (eg ITI-34, 35, 36) a participant should be able to upload an audit message on the Audit Messages tab and do generic validation.
You can see the issue on the ATNA Questionnaire for Nextrials (http://gazelle.ihe.net/gss/questionnaire/viewer.seam?id=102). They support the RFD transactions, but they do not appear on the Audit tab, and they have no way within the Questionnaire to upload a message for those transactions and perform general DICOM validation.