Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: Gazelle TM 5.4.4
-
Fix Version/s: Gazelle TM 5.4.5
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Severity:Minor - Minor impact on the functionality, unreadable or wrong messages, workflow could lead to misunderstandings
-
Sprint:2016 - S16
-
Account:NA-SUPPORT (NASUPPORT)
Description
On the Configuration tab for a vendor, with no filters applied, there is no logical order to the configs presented. Why not sort by actor by default? There is a workaround because the user is able to manually sort the actor column. (see 2.jpg).
If a vendor filters the page to see all of the configs for one actor (how most people will work), there is no logical order to the presentation of the transactions (Details 1) and no way to manually sort this content. This makes this page very difficult for a user to complete his/her work (see 1.jpg).
This issue requests:
(1) When a user first enters the page, the configs should automatically be sorted by actor.
(1a) Ideally, a secondary sort in this case would be by the contents of the Details 1 column
(2) When a user filters the page by actor, the configs should automatically be sorted by Details 1.
(3) Add the ability for the user to manually sort by the Details 1 column
If a vendor filters the page to see all of the configs for one actor (how most people will work), there is no logical order to the presentation of the transactions (Details 1) and no way to manually sort this content. This makes this page very difficult for a user to complete his/her work (see 1.jpg).
This issue requests:
(1) When a user first enters the page, the configs should automatically be sorted by actor.
(1a) Ideally, a secondary sort in this case would be by the contents of the Details 1 column
(2) When a user filters the page by actor, the configs should automatically be sorted by Details 1.
(3) Add the ability for the user to manually sort by the Details 1 column
